There's this thing I've been meaning to do for months. It was a promise I made to myself (and to my uncle, who first suggested it) when I transferred schools. It carried over to my New Year's resolution list. And now, especially since there's no more pressure to outline every weekend in anticipation of a trip to New Zealand, I should really sit down and do it. Or at least get started.
Here is my goal: to make a bona fide effort to write on to law review.
Yes, just a bona fide effort. It would be easy for me to craze about needing to Make It On for my goal to be satisfied. But that's not the approach I want to take. (From what I understand of it, the actual work people do for law review is every bit as photocopying-fun and cite-checking-entertaining as El-Dubyar was.) It's just about giving it a shot, purely for the participatory value. I can't graduate from this law school without at least having tried to make varsity. It'll be gravy if I actually can.
I think there was a general interjournal writing contest for 1Ls last spring, much like at my old school, but that was a one-shot deal and I missed it. And I'm not allowed to play make-believe and do this year's competition along with the 1Ls. But that's OK. There's a separate process for 2Ls and 3Ls interested in writing-on, and in a way it feels rather more productive than the bench-memo-fest in which I participated last year: here, one earns admission to the team by completing a publishable note.
I like the idea of producing something publishable. And it's particularly choice for me to go through this process as a time trial rather than a race: it's not about writing a better bench memo than someone else, or getting better grades, or some other similarly pointless barometric exercise. This is about personal performance rather than competition. Can I pull it off, just me, in a context of my own choosing? I'm curious.
Completing a publishable note is not as simple as sitting down and writing one, though. The preemption vetting is intense: your concept goes through at least two stages of proposals and filtration before you begin writing the actual text of your note. Thus far, I've made it up to the first phase; submitting my short proposal at this point will signal that I'm actually on track to do this instead of just talk about it.
This weekend, I'll write it. (maybe.)
thus spake /jca @ January 23, 2004 03:32 PMWhere you are, I thought that the note had to be published, not just publishable....Good luck!
Posted by: rex at January 24, 2004 09:19 AMRevision: I see that it can be "publishable" or "published." NO FAIR! This is just like how yale and other schools let people participate on journals by choice, while other schools make you engage in a rigorous write-on competition. Darn. Again, good luck!
Posted by: rex at January 24, 2004 09:25 AMHey, just getting to publishable is plenty rigorous here. It's not like at my old school, where something was deemed publishable (for journal writing requirement purposes) if it was of sufficient length and had enough footnotes. Here there are a dozen different ways to get your note-in-progress knocked out of contention such that you're stuck starting over from scratch. It never struck me as a cakewalk.
Posted by: JCA at January 24, 2004 01:06 PMOh, I believe that "publishable" is rigorous--but permit me a bout of envy! I remember people from your new school grappling with the same problem a few years ago--find the legal hook! where's the legal hook?! :)
I find it interesting that school of law doesn't guard its law review status as jealously as other places. I've always found "grading on" ridiculous--I mean, shouldn't grades speak for themselves, without the extra necessity of "Law Review" on the resume? Writing on, be it through a 1L competition or a published (or -able) note, seems like a far more sensible means.
But who am I to buck the system?
Again, good luck JCA. I'm sure you'll come up with something stellar!
Posted by: rex at January 25, 2004 09:08 PMDarn HTML. I meant to say "Unnamed School of Law" not "school of law"
Posted by: rex at January 25, 2004 09:10 PM2/3 of 1Ls grade on at her new school. Only 1/3 get on purely through the writing competition. My understanding from friends at schools where Law Review is purely write-on is that it's also less prestigious. Maybe LR just serves as an easy proxy for good grades for some employers/judges.
Writing on as a 2L or 3L is more about stamina than anything else. I don't understand why more people don't do it. Good luck JCA.
Posted by: 2L at January 26, 2004 05:19 PM